Thursday, March 20, 2008

When Good Companies Do Bad Things

I.                   Social Responsibility in the Context of Globalization

a.       "Have Companies Become Less Ethical? Or Have Society's Standards Changed?" pg. xiv

b.      "The creation of a worldwide market…led commentators to start treating 'capitalism' and 'democracy' as twinned values." pg. 2

II.                Business as Villain: A Historical Overview

a.       Guilds/Exchanges- "trade-based coffeehouses of the 16th & 17th Centuries.

                                                              i.      "Good reputation is a company asset

                                                            ii.      Good reputations are built up over years and take years to repair, but can be destroyed overnight.

b.      "Boycott" Anecdote- 19th Century Irish Land League refused to work with the agent of an English landlord, Colonel Charles Boycott.

c.       Examples of Companies Caught in Policy Changes/Societal Standards

                                                              i.      1783- Slave Trade

                                                            ii.      1869- Railroads and Robber Barons

                                                          iii.      1890- Imperialistic Corporations: Dole Pineapple takes over Hawaii, United Fruit takes over Honduras, etc. "Banana Republic"

III.             Corporations Today, not just biz, but "Partners of Choice"

a.       Royal Dutch/Shell- "Even if you think you're doing the right thing…"

                                                              i.      Brent Spar- Greenpeace's protest vs. decommissioning North Sea oil storage tank. Eventually towed to Norway.

                                                            ii.      Nigeria- Exploitation of Ogoni tribe and land. Nigerian Security Forces killed 9, including well-known writer Ken Saro-Wiwa.

b.      Unocal- Oil company's presence in Myanmar, Burma, & work w/ Taliban

c.       NestlĂ©- Aggressive marketing of formula vs. Infant Feeding ACT et al.

d.      Texaco- Executive racism turned to Pro-diversity example. "the decision to produce a plan that represented a serious long-term commitment instead of a public relations response." Pg. 46

e.       Union Carbide- Poisonous gas leak in Indian "subsidiary." 2-way Internet.

f.       Nike- Sweatshop conditions in China, Philippines--"Lucky to have a job."

g.      A.H. Robins- Dalkon Shield female contraceptive killed 15 women. Judge

h.      Stepping Over the Line

                                                              i.      Bofors Swedish weapons manufacturer sold Howitzers to India. Rajiv Ghandi is "a thief."

                                                            ii.      Thor Chemicals- British firm in South Africa responsible for Mercury poisoning to workers and local water source.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Contrasting IS in Tesco Plc. and Carnival Cruise Lines

 

1. Introduction 

This summary compares and contrasts the key similarities in focus and key differences in chronology of the information systems implemented by Tesco Plc. as explained in the Harvard Business School case by David E. Bell and Carnival Cruise Lines as explained in the Harvard Business School case by Lynda M. Applegate, Robert J. Kwortnik, and Gabriele Piccoli.

 

The focus of both companies in the case studies is identical—that of implementing current and effective information systems in order to attract and retain customers. However, the chronological order of the information systems implementation for the two companies is exactly opposite. 

 

2. Contrasting IS Implementations to Attain Similar Goals

 

The key information systems that were implemented within each organization in contrasting chronologies are:

 

Tesco Pls.

·         Customer Loyalty Program: The Clubcard system tracked customer spending and supplied a 1% return on items purchased by the customer as a loyalty reward. Later, this system allowed for tracking of customer purchases specific to demographic information.

·         Website-based Planning: This information system gathered information about customer buying habits via Tesco.com that were used for store planning and new customer forecasting.

·         Rapid Data Collection: This system is able to forecast and quickly respond to the needs of new customers using a 'pull' strategy to meet demands in quickly expanding new markets, especially international.

 

Carnival Cruise Lines

·         Rapid Data Collection: This information system collected data from current Carnival customers and recorded their on-board buying habits.

·         Website-based Planning: This system gathered information about each customer's planned itinerary to create more accurate event forecasting.

·         Customer Loyalty Program: This system allowed Carnival to attract and retain past-users by tracking their preferences, improving communication, and creating lock-in via the Carnival Vacation Club point offerings.

 

     3. Analysis

 

Companies that wish to remain competitive in the modern global business world must implement current and effective Information Systems. The important responsibility of the company is to determine the definition of information systems that will be the most current and effective for its particular strategy. Tesco and Carnival are two international companies that have undergone their own defining process of information systems during their lifetimes. Both companies defined methods to manage their information systems in a method that is strategically sound, successful and sustainable.

 

The first process for defining information systems required Carnival and Tesco to determine strategic applications for the acquired data. Principally, the organization needed to determine which data to collect and why. These questions were answered identically by each company; however, the identical answers arrived within each company at opposite stages in the companies' lifetimes.

 

From the cruise line's root in the 1970's, Carnival had been operating a primitive information system, reporting that "Carnival had amassed a large past-cruiser database, though the company had done little with it to date" (Applegate, 2). A large part of their data gathering process was acquiring back data that was not acquired first hand—that of the vendor travel agencies. Brenda Yester, VP of Revenue Management, expressed the difficulty that Carnival found in collecting this data, saying, "There's been a lot of discussion in the industry about who owns the guest. No one owns the guest, frankly. Still, we've been very careful about marketing to agents' guests" (Applegate, 7). This "toe-stepping" relationship between Carnival and the travel agents slowed much of their initial data-collection process. They also identified technology incompatibility between their own information systems and those of the agencies as a slowing agent. Although reasonable offerings, I am not certain this was the root of the issue.

 

The major difficulty that I identify for Carnival's reluctance to pursue more current and effective information systems is their lack of perceived value in customer retention. Carnival reported that their "[m]arketing intelligence . . . suggested that other cruise lines saw little return on loyalty spending" (Applegate, 12). In fact, the company CEO had overtly expressed the focus that "cruise lines must develop the first-timer segment in order to convert land vacationers to cruisers." (Applegate, 2). Carnival's belief that their largest customer base would come from the first-time user segment negated the company's motivation to collect past-user data and slowed the implementation of more effective data collection methods.

 

            Tesco, on the other hand, began early to track customers via information systems in order to reward customer loyalty. At first, the Clubcard offered only a cash return of a penny on a pound to Tesco customers, but later the card was used to track customer buying habits and tie it into demographic information. This was such a success that "[t]he company credited knowledge of customer needs derived from Clubcard data with adding three points to its in-stock percentage" (Bell, 4). Tracking customer buying habits quickly proved to be an effective way to forecast sales and growth for the company, as well. John Browett, CEO of Tesco's web operating subsidiary said, "[D]oing the numbers allows you to make the right call. For example, when we lower prices we know exactly how low we can go" (Bell, 9). With the apparent success that technology was playing in company growth, coupled with the rising use of the internet, taking the companies' information systems online seemed like the obvious next step. However, the companies encountered difficulties and learned important lessons in response to their internet launches.

 

            In their effort to use information systems in a current and effective manner, Tesco and Carnival both implemented online programs. These efforts were met with lackluster results that required further research to achieve success. "Launched in December 1996, the [Tesco.com] project soon foundered." John Browett, CEO of the project reported that "[they] discovered that the 5% of the British population who had Internet access didn't buy groceries" (Bell, 8). This was an instance that taught the company that using technology just because it was available was not a road to success. The company studied the way that customers would use the internet service and adjusted their system to fit the customers needs and user habits. "Tesco.com was relaunched with orders taken over the Web and fulfilled from the stores. Logistics were improved in two ways, one by reducing the flexibility of delivery windows and the second by improving the order-picking process" (Bell, 9). Tesco improved their online service and reported that 2% of the company's total sales were bought online by 2002. Although slow to start, Tesco's website became an effective and successful use of information technology.

 

Carnival launched its own website and immediately came to the realization that "[f]ew customers booked online at Carnival.com, in part because of the complexity of the product and the purchase process, but also because most cruise customers still preferred to speak to a 'live' person when buying a cruise." (Applegate, 7). The breakthrough for Carnival that lead to successful use of this technology was the "Fun Pass." This not only aided the company in capturing customer's demographic data, but also allowed for more controlled revenue management and more precise demand forecasting for events. "Having customers sign up for excursions online before they boarded the ship provided significant advantages" (Applegate, 8). As Carnival began to understand more of their customers' wants, it found it could easily appeal to those customers in the future in order to create repeat business. This process lead to the creation of a repeat-user customer loyalty program.

 

            Carnival now took all of the information that it had been collecting about past-users and created a customer loyalty program. "Its first foray was offered as part of the Carnival Vacation Club. This program, sold on selected ships, enabled guests to purchase cruise points redeemable for cruises or time-share products over the following five years. [VP of Marketing Planning, Terry] Thornton explained: 'The value of this program for us is that it locks in future purchases. Once you bought into the carnival vacation club you are not going to cruise with a competitor. Moreover, because the ticket was purchased with points—it's funny money—we see these customers spending much more on board the ship during their cruises" (Applegate, 12). With their development of information systems as an effort to plan for the revenue management of new-users, Carnival created a current and effective system to create loyalty and increase revenue among repeat-users of their product.

 

Tesco had begun the Clubcard in 1995 as a way of rewarding loyal customers to their brand. However, the company quickly entered a period of rapid growth, both across the UK and internationally, meeting with great success on both counts. "At the end of 2002… Tesco was nearing [CEO Terry Leahy's] goal of being 50% international, and perhaps most incredibly of all, it had become the most admired retailer in the United Kindom" (Bell, 11). It achieved this status by rapidly attracting new customers in myriad ethnic and demographic markets. Leahy said, "We needed countries where we would be early entrants" (Bell, 10). These were countries have no brand loyalists, but have instead required of Tesco that they quickly find out what a local market needs and provide it to them. The new "Tesco Way" uses its information systems to draw out the potential needs of the new customers. Leahy said, "You could say that we had pursued a 'pull' strategy overseas by letting the local market dictate what we offer. A 'push' strategy would have presumed we knew what could work and would have proceeded by rolling out store after store" (Bell, 10). By implementing information systems early on in their effort to create a loyalty reward program for repeat-users, Tesco had created a current and effective information system for determining and responding to the demands of new-users to create rapid growth through new customers.

 

     4. Conclusion

 

Tesco Plc. and Carnival Cruise Lines each utilized information systems in order to improve the level of service they were able to offer to new and repeat customers. The key focus for each company was to determine which information to collect and how to manage this data strategically. Both companies essentially used the exact same information systems to achieve the exact same results, but they used them in the exact opposite order. Tesco first determined that it would collect customer information in order to retain customers. Carnival first used customer information to find and plan for new customers. Gradually, Tesco began using its information collecting process as a pull strategy to attract and satisfy new customers. This spurred the company's rapid growth during the period covered in the case study, and will be a source of new revenue for the future. Ultimately, Carnival recognized the value of its information system as a means to retain repeat-users through the creation of customized loyalty programs. Repeat business and advanced purchases will fuel growth and augment future revenues earned from the new-user segment. Information systems can be implemented to both forecast for new-user acquisition and create loyalty programs for past-user retention with equal effectiveness.

 

Sources:

1.  Applegate, Lynda M., Robert J. Kwortnik and Gabriele Piccoli, "Carnival Cruise Lines." April 24, 2006.

2.  Bell, David E. "Tesco Plc." October 16, 2006.
Table 1: Contrasting the Chronological Implementations of Information Systems Foci

                                               

Focus Question

Tesco Plc.

Carnival Cruise Lines

What spurred the initial implementation of information systems strategy?

Focused on Customer Retention

Focused on First-Time Cruisers

What program most attributed to each firms E-business success?

Clubcard, customer needs & fulfillment

Fun Pass, revenue management

What current strategy resulted from the  initial information systems?

"Pull" strategy for New Customers

Customer loyalty programs for Retention

 

Monday, March 10, 2008

My legal memo

MEMORANDUM OF LAW

TO:       eBay's general counsel               

FROM:     Kim Parrish

DATE:     February 23, 2008

RE:       Issues facing eBay France with regards to the Council of Sales' claim that eBay France is in violation of the Auctions laws in France. 

 

Question Presented

Does ebay fall under the restictions oF an online auctioneer house or should they be classified as an online auction broker? If they are cosidered an online auction broker, does the auction act of 2000 still apply?

 

Brief Answer

     Because eBay does not take possession of the items being sold on its website and makes no guarantee for those items they are only acting as an auction broker, not an "Auctioneer" or "Agent." EBay is, therefore, not in violation of the French Auction Act of 2000, which requires the company obtain permits, provide quality assurances, and arrange shipping services, among other guarantees to their French citizens (Sayer,2007).

 

Statement of Facts

     In December 2007, the French government, specifically the Council of Sales, pursued legal action against eBay, suggesting that eBay France was not in compliance with France's auction laws. They argued that eBay had not properly applied for auction permits and is not providing the proper customer safeguards, which are required by the Council's 2000 Auction Act.

 

 

Discussion

Does ebay fall under the restictions of an online auctioneer house or should they be classified as an online auction broker? If they are cosidered an online auction broker, does the auction act of 2000 still apply?

 

     In France, traditional auction houses and online auctions are strictly regulated by the Council of Sales and the Auction Act of July 10, 2000, which is a modernization of the Auction Act of 1841. The Act specifically regulates traditional auction Houses and online auctioneers, but does not regulate online auction brokers. The main subject for consideration then, is whether or not eBay falls under the title of online auction broker or online auctioneer. The main difference between to the two classifications is the level of involvement that the agent or broker plays in the transaction. According to Article 3 of the Auction Act of 2000, an auction regulated by an auctioneer is "the offer for sale of movable property over the internet by a person acting as the 'agent' of the owner of this property for adjudication to the highest bidder constitutes a public action sale," which can be regulated by the Council of Sales (Misse & Belin,2007). The Auction Act goes on to define an agent as someone who temporarily takes over the property of the seller and acts on their behalf to negotiate the highest bid from among the buyers. In France, the auctioneer is a "public official, registered under the regulatory authority of the Minister of Justice, and authorized to conduct auction sales, [and is]in charge of defending the seller with payment guaranty and of protecting the buyer with authenticity guaranty" (www.auction.fr, 2005).

     The French government believes that eBay is an auctioneer, and acting in that capacity eBay has not obtained the proper permits and is not providing the necessary guarantees to their customers, which violates the Auction Act of 2000. eBay's top management, in contrast, has been quoted saying that they are only "facilitators" or brokers of auctions, and that "eBay has invented a new way of buying and selling, which has been adopted by 10 million French people," where they are merely brokers of the transaction, not agents (qted in Out-Law.com). In other words, eBay's official position is that they are an online auction broker and not an online auctioneer.

     For the French government's claim to be true they would need to prove eBay is an auctioneer: according to French law, eBay would need to be an agent of the items being sold. To act as an "Agent" under the Auction Act eBay would need to take possession of the item being sold and sell them on behalf of their owner (auction.fr, 2005). EBay would also need to regulate the shipment and money transfer of the items being sold. EBay purposely does neither of these actions. They do not regulate shipping, because the items are all over the world and some do not need to be shipped, nor do they claim ownership over the items, because this would hinder the speed and openness of the transitions on their site. Their goal is to provide an online forum where online buyers and sellers can meet to exchange goods. EBay has a commitment to be a"venue to allow anyone to offer, sell, and buy just about anything, at anytime, from anywhere, in a variety of pricing formats" (eBay user agreement, 2008). This open policy allows for a much greater diversity of items being sold and gives a lot more flexibility to their customers. EBay's website does keep tract of bids, but that is the only service they provide, they never claim to act on behalf of the seller. Thus, eBay is best defined as an online auction broker, not auctioneer, and aims to give their buyers and sellers the most freedom possible.

     This does not mean that eBay does not want to protect its clients; in fact they take great measures to do so. One example is their use of seller ratings where buyers can rate the sellers, making sure any dishonest sellers are not used again. Furthermore, even though eBay does not regulate the payment of their goods they do suggest users use companies like paypalTM which provide some liability protection that eBay does not. EBay takes these steps because they are committed to their customers, not because they are auctioneers or forced to do so by law.

 

Conclusion

     EBay has a commitment to its users to provide the greatest access to products available. They are committed to letting sellers commune directly with buyers, and therefore take on the role of broker, not agent, and are not bound by France's Auction Act of 2000 which regulates Auctioneers and Auction houses, but does not regulate brokers.


Bibliography

 

auction.fr. (2005). "auctioneer."   Retrieved February 22, 2008, from http://www.auction.fr/uk/divers/savoir.html.

Brigitte Misse, J.-L. B., Murielle Cahen. (2007). "ARE INTERNET AUCTION SALES LEGAL UNDER FRENCH LAW?"   Retrieved February 23, 2008, from http://www.ibls.com/members/docview.aspx?doc=755

ebay.com. (2008). "Your User Agreement."   Retrieved February 24, 2008, from http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/user-agreement.html.

OUT-LAW.COM. (December 5, 2007). "Auction watchdog says eBay is illegal in France."   Retrieved February 24, 2008, from http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2007/12/05/france_says_non_to_ebay_broker_claims/.

Sayer, P. (2007). "French auction regulator sues to close down eBay France."   Retrieved February 23, 2008, from http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/12/03/French-auction-regulator-sues-to-close-down-eBay-France_1.html.

           

 

 

 

 

 



--
Kimberly Parrish
Global Partners MBA
Kimberly.Parrish@gmail.com
770-366-3936

Greer Law Paper

MEMORANDUM OF LAW

TO: Professor Benjamin Greer

FROM: Shawn Butler

DATE: February 24, 2008

RE: Regulatory Action of French Council of Sales vs. eBay Inc. France

STATEMENT OF FACTS

France's auction house regulatory Authority, Council of Sales, challenges the legality of eBay France, the France-based division of the California, USA online auction and shopping website company eBay Inc. The Authority asserts "that eBay's French site 'should be held to the same standards as other auction houses in France,' which are required to acquire a special permit from authorities that includes guarantees of consumer protection."1

The requirement of permits allows the Authority to impose regulations regarding auction houses aimed at preventing the inadvertent sale of stolen goods, counterfeits, and frauds.

eBay Inc. responds by stating that it "has 'invented another way of buying and selling' not covered by the law on auction houses."3 The company's claim is that they are not an auction house but a "facilitator"4 or a brokerage company for sellers and buyers.

The Authority said "that eBay's failure to abide by the rules governing auction houses leaves consumers open to exploitation by unscrupulous eBay users, and could make it easier for users to sell fakes or to evade tax."4

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

A. Is eBay correct in its allegation that it has invented something completely different from an auction house using its online auction and marketplace model?

B. Should eBay fall under the same rules regulating auction houses and be responsible for the validity of the goods traded through its service?

DISCUSSION

A. eBay defines itself on its website as "[t]he World's Online Marketplace®, enabling trade on a local, national and international basis. With a diverse and passionate community of individuals and small businesses, eBay offers an online platform where millions of items are traded each day."6 This careful avoidance of the term "auction" in their own description neither states that the company operates, by its own definition, as a brokerage or an auction house.

However, for the opposition, the semantics does not appear to be the key issue. "The Council said that it did not accept eBay's assertion that it was simply a broker and not an actual auctioneer. 'What is the difference?' [Council chairman Christian] Giacomotto said to The Times. 'They charge a commission to the seller and a commission to the buyer. These people cannot say they are responsible for nothing at all. If you rent your house to someone who sets up an illegal casino in it, then you share part of the responsibility.'"4

The logic presented by Chairman Giacomotto is verifiable; that the owner of a house bears partial responsibility for illegal activities that occur in the house on the part of the renter is well represented in precedent. Whether or not this scenario relates to the online auction sector is still a matter of deliberation.

B. The overt reason given by the Council to impose the requirement of licensing on eBay France is to protect the consumer, but they also are interested in protecting other auction houses. "This is unfair competition, because other auctioneers have to make sure they are transparent and that they provide guarantees," Council chairman Christian Giacomotto told The Times. 'Our ambition is not to regulate the world, but we want groups such as eBay to accept their responsibility.'"4

The responsibility mentioned here is the requirement to purchase insurance against fraud on the part of the auction house which puts the house itself responsible for authenticating that the goods bought and sold on the site are verifiable and legally obtained. Currently, eBay takes no responsibility for fraud committed via its website.

Which laws can be applied to the company is again dependent on the way that it is determined the company is doing business, whether as an auction house or as a brokerage. "[The July 2000] law makes a clear distinction between the activities of online auctioneers, which have a mandate from the owner of the goods to sell them to the highest bidder, and online auction brokerages, where no third party intervenes between the buyer and the seller to complete the sale. Online auctioneers must obey the same rules as physical auction houses, in particular taking responsibility for delivering the goods to the buyer, but auction brokers are almost exempt from regulation, except where the goods sold are "cultural products" such as books, CDs, or DVDs, according to the regulator." 3

Finally, other matters that should be considered are the cases cited parallel to this regulation by the council in France. "Last month, [November 2007,] the regulator filed suit against the online car auction site Carsat.fr seeking a similar court injunction to halt its activities, which it said were being conducted without due authorization, and warned that other online auctioneers faced similar action."3


"French regulation of internet businesses recently failed when the Government lost a case in which it tried to prevent an online gambling company from operating. A Maltese horserace betting site, Zeturf, had a ruling banning it from operating overturned in July by France's highest court, the Cour de Cassation. That court said that France's state monopoly on gambling broke EU competition rules."4

It could be construed that similar financial and monopolistic motivations could be spurring the regulatory Councils investigations into eBay France.

CONCLUSION

eBay has been a successful and fast-growing company since its inception in 1995 and currently operates in 30 countries. The reputation for fraud on the website is well documented. "It is estimated that about a quarter of all ancient coins and about two-thirds of all antiquities sold on eBay are modern forgeries."5

A. eBay defines itself as something new that falls outside of the scope of auction houses or brokers. By this definition, they are attempting to fall outside of the legal limits regarding both institutions. The best comparison, however for eBay would be to not claim to be something brand new, but rather to be something that is already understood by governmental agencies.

The action and model of eBay is much more similar to the current function of newspaper classified advertisement sections that have been posted online. In the case of online classifieds, zero fault or responsibility is assigned to the posting agent as it regards fraud. A simple disclaimer that buyers should be cautious and careful in their transactions via the media serves to prevent the allocation of guilt.

B. By finding eBay to be subject to the same requirements as an auction house and responsible for verifying its goods and services will leave the company financially responsible for fraud on its site. This additional monetary responsibility will quite possibly change the model of eBay from an online auction to an online marketplace, in order to avoid the impending financial burden. If France's Council determines the requirement of a permit, it is likely that other countries will impose the same restrictions.

Rather than having to follow the laws regarding auction houses, or even the more relaxed laws regarding brokerages, eBay should be held to the legal regulations that apply to other vehicles that simply connect buyers and sellers together, like classified advertising and public bulletin boards. The Council of Sales is misguided in its attempts to apply the July 2000 law to the French division of the eBay company.

RESOURCES

1. http://www.caltradereport.com/eWebPages/page-two-1198255692.html

2.http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=72200&videoChannel=5

3. http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/12/03/French-auction-regulator-sues-to-close-down-eBay-France_1.html

4.http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2007/12/05/france_says_non_to_ebay_broker_claims/

5. http://rg.ancients.info/guide/counterfeits.html

6. http://pages.ebay.com/aboutebay.html?_trksid=m40

About Us

My photo
Atlanta, GA, United States
Shown in picture top-bottom, left-right: Denis Asonganyi, Carol Sautter, Del Moses, Shawn Butler, Christopher Kittrel, Michael Burke, Kim Parrish, Emily Tsang, Cherie Berkley, Lena Kim, Alaina Inman, Fumu Gakodi, Jaime LaTorre, Caro Katis, Melissa Efferth, Leslie Brown, Bridget Boyer, Rebecca Gould, Stas Garmash, Maggie Mariscal.